KING Parents and Swimmers:
More or less, since 2003, KING swimmers and surrounding areas have
not had much need for concern about pool closures. That is no
longer the case. These days, there is serious cause for alarm in
light of recent events.
If you do not know your KING and surrounding pool history, I will
give you a brief summary leading to where we are now.
- In the summer of 2002:
- KING County announced it was transferring
ownership of the ’forward thrust’ pools, which were
operated as King County Parks, to the cities in which those pools
resided. The cities were, in effect, given four months to figure
out what they wanted to do with pools which accrued annual losses
of approximately $300,000 under County management. Mary Wayte, Kent
Pool, Covington Pool and Mount Rainier Pool are former
’forward thrust’ pools which KING uses.
- In the beginning of 2003:
Each one of these pools require(d) a significant
amount of volunteering, political posturing and under-appreciated
hard work to keep open during this critical transition period (and
ongoing to date). As noted, Mary Wayte, Mount Rainier and Kent are
operated by private companies who are given subsidies by the Cities
(no where near the $300,000 mark of loss above, in all cases less
than a third), or groups of cities, where the pools are
located.
Although I am doing a disservice to the many people who have
sacrificed greatly in keeping these facilities going by not
mentioning names, that is the brief history to set up the rest of
the email. Moving on...
So, we’ve made it six years, what’s the problem?
There are some sizable issues stacking up. If we don’t take
action immediately, we may lose at least one of our main
facilities by the end of the year (Mount Rainier).
Factors:
- Carol Anne Wald Memorial Pool - closed
this year
- Juanita High School Pool in Redmond -
slated to close at end of summer
- Fircrest pool in Shoreline - closed this
year
- Evergreen Pool in Burien - scheduled to
close in June
Why are these factors? One of the big
motivations, in my opinion, to cities keeping pools open in 2003
was a desire not to be ’the only one’ who did not keep
their pool open. It was seen as a political disaster to shut down a
pool. With at least four pools slated to close this year in the
Seattle area, it may be much more palatable for pool funding to be
cut. They think , "See, we aren’t the only ones, and we all
know the economy is bad." The political motivation to stay
open is less. This is a very dangerous
position for swimming.
Other factors:
- Highline School District is proposing to
cut the swim/dive teams for the 2009/2010
seasons. Not only is this tragic for teams who
have a great swimming history (Mount Rainier High School being one
of those), but it is also possibly a precursor to closing the Mount
Rainier Pool (which is owned by Highline School District).
- UW Swimming was cut a couple weeks
ago. This was a tragedy for swimming in the Northwest. I
could speak volumes on this topic, but I include it here as
dramatic evidence that no pool or program is untouchable.
If UW can cut the swimming program with little or no
notice, then why would we think closing Mount Rainier is
impossible?
Where is the Mount Rainier Pool situation?
Good question. The Mount Rainier Pool Coalition (Highline School
District, Des Moines, Normandy Park) has proposed to create a new
park district (or pool district) which would oversee the pool
management/subsidy and also determine the amount taxed per $1000 of
property tax for its constituency to effectively operate the
facility. In essence, this is potentially a great model for
everyone. It takes the financial burden off of the fiscally
troubled Cities and the School District. It potentially generates
more tax revenue than currently available to not only operate but
to also improve the Mount Rainier pool.
So, what’s the problem?
- The proposed park district can only be created
(it is its own political entity) in a general election of the
geographic areas it would cover. Voters need to be notified, aware
and motivated to go vote. The proposal will be voted on in
November of 2009. I’ve never been a part of
something like this, but we’ve been told that not being
aggressive will almost certainly lead to failure.
We must be proactive.
- We have not found a person who is
willing to lead the charge on ensuring the continuation of
the Highline School programs or organizing people to drive the vote
in favor of the proposed park district.
- The Highline School District swimming team
decision will happen in the coming weeks.
- If the park (or pool) district is created, it
would serve us well to find swimming friendly people to serve on
the pool district committee. Those people must reside in the
geographically covered areas.
If these things aren’t done and the
levy fails, the Mount Rainier Pool will close in December of
2009. It is not only a significant asset to the community
it serves, but it has also become an important piece of KING
operations. We will not be the same without it. It could
potentially affect the programs we
offer and also the level of coaching/staffing we can support.
If you are interested in helping, please send an email to SaveMRPool@comcast.net. Both volunteering time and financial support
are needed. And, don’t forget, we need a leader!!!
Last minute addition... There will be significant discussion on
this topic at the Des Moines City Council Meeting on the 28th of
May. If you live in Des Moines or Normandy Park or have children in
the Highline School District, please try to attend.
We can make this happen if we band together and do it!
Go KING!
Sean Hutchison
Head Coach
|